Inzamam and his claim of unsportsing appeal.

Inzamam has made a great big furore about how Dravid and the Indian team were unsporting to appeal for the obstruction. Now Dravid says that he thinks that it was not unsporting. I have to admit, regrardless of me being Indian, that I agree with Dravid.

I havent actually seen the incident. All reports that I have read and heard about the dismissal say that Inzamam casually hit the ball as if he was defending the ball. But he did this outside the crease. From the reports I also get the impression that the ball most probably was going to hit the stumps dismissing Inzamam. Coming from this position, I don't see how Inzamam can claim that it was unsporting. He would have been out if he had not defended the ball. The indians rightfully appealed and got him out. Plain and simple dont you think?